4.4 Article

Living with scleroderma: patients' perspectives, a phenomenological study

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 32, Issue 11, Pages 3573-3579

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-011-2230-2

Keywords

Scleroderma; Rare disease; Chronic illness; Phenomenological study

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, it is aimed to determine the daily life experiences of patients on the basis their own way of statement. Sixteen patients with scleroderma were enrolled to this qualitative study. Data were collected using both a demographic data form and a semi-structured interview form. Study was made on individual patient interview by face-to-face manner. Data were evaluated using Colaizzi's phenomenological data analysis method. Data analysis revealed four categories and nine topics. These categories were (1) physical impact of disease, (2) emotional impact of disease, (3) social impact of disease and (4) patient behaviours for the cope with the disease. As emotional impact, patients imply that they have experienced disappointment, hope to get well and have fears about the future. In the physical impact category, tight skin, limitations of hand skills, swelling of the hands and feet, fatigue, swallowing difficulties and deformation of their bodies were the prominent features. In patients with recognizable disease, difficulty to join to social activities increases and eventually leads to isolation. There was also some evidence that patients who have been supported by their family and close relatives seem to be more optimistic about their disease. Most patients are not willing to communicate with other patients, particularly in an advanced stage. Scleroderma patients imply that they experience several difficulties regarding emotional, physical and social aspects. Individual abilities to cope with the disease were much more improved among patients who have a sustained social support. For advanced patients with apparent deformations, an effective social support system should be introduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available