4.7 Review

Growing evidence of the safety of JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 34-42

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key287

Keywords

Janus kinase; RA; safety; tofacitinib; baricitinib; adverse event; infection; herpes zoster; malignancy; thromboembolism

Categories

Funding

  1. Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co.
  2. Bristol Myers Squib
  3. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
  4. Eisai Co., Ltd
  5. Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd
  6. Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
  7. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
  8. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.
  9. Teijin Pharma Ltd

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To facitinib and baricitinib are two of the currently available Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for the treatment of patients with RA. Randomized controlled trials have shown that these JAK inhibitors are as efficacious as biological DMARDs. Safety profiles of these JAK inhibitors in randomized controlled trials and their long-term extension studies have been demonstrated; however, real world evidence remains to be established to bridge the gap between randomized controlled trials and rheumatology clinics. Fundamentally, no difference in the screening, prevention, and monitoring of infections between JAK inhibitors and biological DMARDs exists. However, increased risk of herpes zoster is probably common to all JAK inhibitors. No indication of increased risk for malignancy in patients with RA treated with JAK inhibitors has been reported. To evaluate risks of relatively rare serious adverse events such as thromboembolic events, gastrointestinal perforation, and interstitial lung disease in clinical settings, accumulation of cases with these events are needed. Continuous pharmacovigilance activity is absolutely warranted to establish the safety of JAK inhibitors in patients with RA and other rheumatic diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available