4.7 Article

Tocilizumab: a novel therapy for patients with large-vessel vasculitis

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 151-156

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker296

Keywords

interleukin-6; tocilizumab; large-vessel vasculitis; Takayasu arteritis; giant cell arteritis

Categories

Funding

  1. Associazione Malattie reumatiche Luca da Reggio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Treatment of large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) remains challenging. Patients usually respond to glucocorticoid (GC) therapy, but often relapse on tapering of the GC dose or after GC withdrawal. In addition, GCs are fraught with numerous adverse events. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with LVV. Methods. Four patients with active LVV (two with GCA and two with Takayasu arteritis) received monthly TCZ infusions (8 mg/kg bodyweight) for 6 consecutive months. Two patients were treatment naive, while two had relapsing disease. Disease activity and drug tolerability were assessed clinically and by laboratory tests at study entry and subsequently every month for 6 months of TCZ treatment, while an [F-18] fluorodeoxyglucose PET (PET/CT) scan was performed before and after treatment. In addition, a semi-quantitative clinical evaluation was performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 months using the Indian Takayasu activity score and the Kerr indices. After TCZ, MTX was used as maintenance therapy. Results. All patients treated with TCZ therapy had a satisfactory clinical and laboratory response, while PET/CT findings significantly improved in all cases. No serious adverse events were noted. Only one patient had a transient increase in liver enzymes. Conclusions. In this small group of patients with LVV, treatment with TCZ was effective and well tolerated. Further, larger studies are required to confirm our findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available