4.7 Article

Assessment of active inflammation in juvenile dermatomyositis: a novel magnetic resonance imaging-based scoring system

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 12, Pages 2237-2244

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker262

Keywords

Juvenile dermatomyositis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Scoring system; Reproducibility

Categories

Funding

  1. Versus Arthritis [18474] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Arthritis Research UK [18474] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Versus Arthritis [18474] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods. Forty-eight children (33 girls) underwent retrospective assessment of their MRI studies by two musculoskeletal paediatric radiologists for the presence of disease activity. Each observer performed the readings on two separate occasions. The degree of concordance between the two observers and between the two readings was assessed using kappa analysis. The reproducibility of the total score was determined using Bland-Altman analysis. Results. There was fair to moderate agreement between the two observers for all the examined disease activity markers in all muscle groups. There was good intra-observer agreement between the two readings. There was no difference according to the side evaluated. The mean total score (out of 20) for Observer 1 was 7.9 and for Observer 2 was 7.5 (mean difference -0.4, 95% limits of agreement -6.8 to 6.0), while the mean total scores for Observer 1 were 9.0 for the first reading and 7.9 for the second reading (mean difference 1.0, 95% limits of agreement -2.6 to 4.6). Conclusion. Markers of inflammatory change in JDM can be observed on MRI in a reliable fashion and have been used to make a reliable and objective scoring system. The accuracy of the proposed scoring system is acceptable for the single reader, although there is more variability between two different individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available