4.7 Article

Risk of non-melanoma skin cancer in a national cohort of veterans with rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages 1431-1439

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker113

Keywords

Non-melanoma skin cancer; Non-biologic; TNF antagonist; DMARDs; Rheumatoid arthritis

Categories

Funding

  1. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration Health Services Research and Development Service [IAF 06-026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methods. We examined skin cancer risk in a cohort of 20 648 patients with RA derived from the Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA) national administrative databases. The cohort was divided into two medication groups: patients treated with non-biologic and TNF-alpha antagonist DMARDs. We defined skin cancer as the first occurrence of an International Classification of Disease, Version 9, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for NMSC after initiation of a DMARD. Outcome risk was described using hazard ratios (HRs) with Cox proportional hazards regression for time-to-event analysis and logistic regression. We performed medical record review to validate the diagnosis of NMSC. Results. Incidence of NMSC was 18.9 and 12.7 per 1000 patient-years in patients on TNF-alpha antagonists and non-biologic DMARDs, respectively. Patients on TNF-alpha antagonists had a higher risk of developing NMSC (HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.24, 1.63). Risk factors for NMSC included older age, male gender, NSAID and glucocorticoid use and a history of prior malignancies. There was substantial agreement between ICD-9-CM diagnosis of NMSC and medical record validation (kappa = 0.61). Conclusion. TNF-alpha antagonist therapy in veterans with RA may be associated with an increased risk of NMSC, compared with therapy with non-biologic DMARDs. Rheumatologists should carefully screen patients receiving TNF-alpha antagonists for pre-cancerous skin lesions and skin cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available