4.7 Article

Do OA patients gain additional benefit from care from a clinical nurse specialista randomized clinical trial

Journal

RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 658-664

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep049

Keywords

Osteoarthritis; Randomized controlled trial; Clinical nurse specialist clinic; Patient outcome

Categories

Funding

  1. ARC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To assess whether OA patients attending a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) clinic gain additional benefit compared with those attending a traditional junior hospital doctor (JHD) clinic. Methods. A total of 100 patients with OA attending rheumatology clinics at a UK teaching hospital were randomly allocated to a CNS or JHD clinic and seen at 0, 16, 32 and 48 weeks. The study assessed (i) non-inferiority of the CNS with respect to clinical outcomes (pain, morning stiffness, self-efficacy, physical function and psychological status) and (ii) superiority of the CNS in terms of patient knowledge and satisfaction. Results. Average pain at follow-up was lower in the CNS group: unadjusted mean difference for the JHD group minus the CNS group was 5.3 (95 CI 4.6, 15.2); adjusted was 1.6 (95 CI 5.7, 8.9). The corresponding effect size estimates were 0.20 (95 CI 0.17, 0.57) and 0.06 (95 CI 0.21, 0.33), respectively. There were similar outcomes in morning stiffness, physical function and self-efficacy. Patient knowledge and satisfaction were statistically significant at the 5 level attaining moderate to large effect sizes in favour of the CNS. Conclusions. Our findings demonstrate that the clinical outcome of CNS care is not inferior to that of JHD care, and patients attending CNS gain additional benefit in that they are better informed about their disease and significantly more satisfied with care than are their counterparts. Trial registration. ISRCTN 65487167.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available