4.3 Article

In vivo RNAi screen identifies NLK as a negative regulator of mesenchymal activity in glioblastoma

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 24, Pages 20145-20159

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3980

Keywords

glioblastoma; RNA interference screen; Nemo-like kinase; stemness; mesenchymal

Funding

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI14C3418]
  3. National Research Foundation - Ministry of Science [NRF-2012M3A6A-2010-0029781]
  4. NIH [R01 NS082312, R01 NS 083767]
  5. ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) of Korea
  6. Samsung Medical Center [GFO1140011]
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25293072, 26114006] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal brain cancer with profound genomic alterations. While the bona fide tumor suppressor genes such as PTEN, NF1, and TP53 have high frequency of inactivating mutations, there may be the genes with GBM-suppressive roles for which genomic mutation is not a primary cause for inactivation. To identify such genes, we employed in vivo RNAi screening approach using the patient-derived GBM xenograft models. We found that Nemo-Like Kinase (NLK) negatively regulates mesenchymal activities, a characteristic of aggressive GBM, in part via inhibition of WNT/beta-catenin signaling. Consistent with this, we found that NLK expression is especially low in a subset of GBMs that harbors high WNT/mesenchymal activities. Restoration of NLK inhibited WNT and mesenchymal activities, decreased clonogenic growth and survival, and impeded tumor growth in vivo. These data unravel a tumor suppressive role of NLK and support the feasibility of combining oncogenomics with in vivo RNAi screen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available