4.3 Article

High LIFr expression stimulates melanoma cell migration and is associated with unfavorable prognosis in melanoma

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 28, Pages 25484-25498

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4688

Keywords

LIFr; melanoma; biomarker; cell migration

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research Skin Research Training Centre (CIHR-SRTC)
  2. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-93810, MOP-110974, CCI-117958]
  4. Canadian Dermatology Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased or decreased expression of LIF receptor (LIFr) has been reported in several human cancers, including skin cancer, but its role in melanoma is unknown. In this study, we investigated the expression pattern of LIFr in melanoma and assessed its prognostic value. Using tissue microarrays consisting of 441 melanomas and 96 nevi, we found that no normal nevi showed high LIFr expression. LIFr staining was significantly increased in primary melanoma compared to dysplastic nevi (P = 0.0003) and further increased in metastatic melanoma (P = 0.0000). Kaplan-Meier survival curve and univariate Cox regression analyses showed that increased expression of LIFr was correlated with poorer 5-year patient survival (overall survival, P = 0.0000; disease-specific survival, P = 0.0000). Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that increased LIFr expression was an independent prognostic marker for primary melanoma (P = 0.036). LIFr knockdown inhibited melanoma cell migration in wound healing assays and reduced stress fiber formation. LIFr knockdown correlated with STAT3 suppression, but not YAP, suggesting that LIFr activation might stimulate melanoma cell migration through the STAT3 pathway. Our data indicate that strong LIFr expression identifies potentially highly malignant melanocytic lesions at an early stage and LIFr may be a potential target for the development of early intervention therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available