4.3 Article

Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, induces formation of stress granules in hepatocarcinoma cells

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 41, Pages 43927-43943

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5980

Keywords

stress granules; sorafenib; PERK; eIF2a; ATF4

Funding

  1. Louis Poirier scholarship (Fondation du CHU de Quebec)
  2. Canadian Institute Health Research (CH-IR) [MOP-IC093226-CBT]
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation [MOP-GF091050]
  4. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (Innovation) [702406]
  5. CIHR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress granules (SGs) are cytoplasmic RNA multimeric bodies that form under stress conditions known to inhibit translation initiation. In most reported stress cases, the formation of SGs was associated with the cell recovery from stress and survival. In cells derived from cancer, SGs formation was shown to promote resistance to either proteasome inhibitors or 5-Fluorouracil used as chemotherapeutic agents. Despite these studies, the induction of SGs by chemotherapeutic drugs contributing to cancer cells resistance is still understudied. Here we identified sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat hepatocarcinoma, as a potent chemotherapeutic inducer of SGs. The formation of SGs in sorafenib-treated hepatocarcionoma cells correlates with inhibition of translation initiation; both events requiring the phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2'. Further characterisation of the mechanism of sorafenib-induced SGs revealed PERK as the main eIF2' kinase responsible for SGs formation. Depletion experiments support the implication of PERK-eIF2'-SGs pathway in hepatocarcinoma cells resistance to sorafenib. This study also suggests the existence of an unexpected complex regulatory balance between SGs and phospho-eIF2' where SGs dampen the activation of the phospho-eIF2'-downstream ATF4 cell death pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available