4.3 Article

Epigenetic alterations in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and hippocampus contribute to age-related cognitive decline

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 27, Pages 23181-23203

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4036

Keywords

aging; brain; memory; circadian rhythms; Gerotarget

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Alzheimer's Society of Canada
  4. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council PGSD-3 scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circadian rhythm dysfunction and cognitive decline, specifically memory loss, frequently accompany natural aging. Circadian rhythms and memory are intertwined, as circadian rhythms influence memory formation and recall in young and old rodents. Although, the precise relationship between circadian rhythms and memory is still largely unknown, it is hypothesized that circadian rhythm disruption, which occurs during aging, contributes to age-associated cognitive decline, specifically memory loss. While there are a variety of mechanisms that could mediate this effect, changes in the epigenome that occur during aging has been proposed as a potential candidate. Interestingly, epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation and sirtuin1 (SIRT1) are necessary for both circadian rhythms and memory. During aging, similar alterations of epigenetic mechanisms occur in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and hippocampus, which are necessary for circadian rhythm generation and memory, respectively. Recently, circadian rhythms have been linked to epigenetic function in the hippocampus, as some of these epigenetic mechanisms oscillate in the hippocampus and are disrupted by clock gene deletion. The current paper will review how circadian rhythms and memory change with age, and will suggest how epigenetic changes in these processes might contribute to age-related cognitive decline.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available