4.3 Article

Mutation of N-linked glycosylation at Asn548 in CD133 decreases its ability to promote hepatoma cell growth

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 24, Pages 20650-20660

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4115

Keywords

N-linked glycosylation; CD133; hepatoma; cell growth

Funding

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [31370807, 81172059, 81272435, 21335002]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB910500]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau [XYQ2011047]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The membrane glycoprotein CD133 is a popular marker for cancer stem cells and contributes to cancer initiation and invasion in a number of tumor types. CD133 promotes tumorigenesis partly through an interaction between its phosphorylated Y828 residue and the PI3K regulatory subunit p85, and the interaction with beta-catenin. Although CD133 glycosylation is supposed to be associated with its function, the contribution of N-glycosylation to its functions remains unclear. Here we analyzed the exact site(s) of N-glycosylation in CD133 by mass spectrometry and found that all eight potential N-glycosylation sites of CD133 could be indeed occupied by N-glycans. Loss of individual N-glycosylation sites had no effect on the level of expression or membrane localization of CD133. However, mutation at glycosylation site Asn548 significantly decreased the ability of CD133 to promote hepatoma cell growth. Furthermore, mutation of Asn548 reduced the interaction between CD133 and beta-catenin and inhibited the activation of beta-catenin signaling by CD133 overexpression. Our results identified the characteristics and function of CD133 glycosylation sites. These data could potentially shed light on molecular regulation of CD133 by glycosylation and enhance our understanding of the utility of glycosylated CD133 as a target for cancer therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available