4.3 Article

Inhibition of PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis disrupts oxidative stress-mediated survival of melanoma cells

Journal

ONCOTARGET
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 7195-7208

Publisher

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.3131

Keywords

Reactive oxygen species; oxidative stress; mTORC1; melanoma; Nexrutine(R)

Funding

  1. VA Merit [I01BX000-766]
  2. Cancer Therapy and Research Center at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio [2P30 CA054174-17]
  3. [1R21CA125719]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elevated oxidative stress in cancer cells contributes to hyperactive proliferation and enhanced survival, which can be exploited using agents that increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) beyond a threshold level. Here we show that melanoma cells exhibit an oxidative stress phenotype compared with normal melanocytes, as evidenced by increased total cellular ROS, KEAP1/NRF2 pathway activity, protein damage, and elevated oxidized glutathione. Our overall objective was to test whether augmenting this high oxidative stress level in melanoma cells would inhibit their dependence on oncogenic PI3K/AKT/mTOR-mediated survival. We report that Nexrutine(R) augmented the constitutively elevated oxidative stress markers in melanoma cells, which was abrogated by N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) pre-treatment. Nexrutine(R) disrupted growth homeostasis by inhibiting proliferation, survival, and colony formation in melanoma cells without affecting melanocyte cell viability. Increased oxidative stress in melanoma cells inhibited PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway through disruption of mTORC1 formation and phosphorylation of downstream targets p70S6K, 4EBP1 and rpS6. NAC pre-treatment reversed inhibition of mTORC1 targets, demonstrating a ROS-dependent mechanism. Overall, our results illustrate the importance of disruption of the intrinsically high oxidative stress in melanoma cells to selectively inhibit their survival mediated by PI3K/AKT/mTOR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available