4.2 Article

Parapneumonic pleural effusions and empyema in adults: current practice

Journal

REVISTA CLINICA ESPANOLA
Volume 209, Issue 10, Pages 485-494

Publisher

EDICIONES DOYMA S A
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2565(09)72634-7

Keywords

Empyema; Parapneumonic; effusion; Pleural effusion

Funding

  1. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria [FIS 06/0725]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

About 20% of hospitalized patients with bacterial pneumonia have an accompanying pleural effusion. Parapneumonic effusions (PPE) are associated with a considerable morbidity and mortality. The main decision in managing a patient with a PPE is whether to insert a chest tube (complicated PPE). Imaging (i.e., chest radiograph, ultrasound and computed tomography) and pleural fluid analysis (i.e., pH, glucose, Lactate dehydrogenase, bacterial. cults) provide essential information for patient managment. Therefore, all PPEs should be aspirated for diagnostic purposes. This may require image-guidance if the effusion is small or heavily loculated. According to the current guidelines, any PPE that fulfills at least one of the following criteria should be drained: size >= 1/2 of the hemithorax, loculations, pleural fluid pH < 7.20 (or alternatively pleural fluid glucose < 60 mg/dl), positive pleural fluid Gram stain or culture, or purulent appearance. The key components of the treatment of complicated PPE and empyema are the use of appropriate antibiotics, provision of nutritional support, and drainage of the pleural space by one of the following methods: therapeutic thoracentesis, tube thoracostomy, intrapleural fibrinolytics, thoracoscopy with breakdown of adhesions or thoracotomy with decortication. The routine use of intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy remains controversial. (C) 2009 Elsevier Espana, S.L. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available