3.9 Article

Craving decrease with topiramate in outpatient treatment for cocaine dependence: an open label trial

Journal

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 132-135

Publisher

ASSOC BRASILEIRA PSIQUIATRIA
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-44462008005000012

Keywords

cocaine-related disorders; behavior, addictive; topiramate; clinical trial [publication type]; clinical protocols

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate anticraving action and tolerability of topiramate in cocaine user treatment. Method: Male users of inhaled cocaine which met criteria for cocaine dependence (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition) were selected for outpatient 12-week, open label trial with topiramate; individual dosage ranged between 25-300 mg/day. Main clinical variables were abstinence rate, craving intensity, frequency and duration, adherence, dropouts, side effects and impulsivity measure through Barratt Impulsivity Scale. Patients received assertive strategic counseling for abstinence assistance and medication monitoring evaluation every two weeks. Comparative analysis was made with intention to treat, missing values were replaced (last observation carried forward), and significance level was 5%. Results: Adherence to treatment was 57% (at least three evaluations), 32% dropped out (one evaluation). There were no severe side effects. Negative test average was 25.4% (31.2). Significant reduction in craving intensity and duration was observed in 25% of the sample. No statistical significant reduction in craving frequency was observed in 7.1%. Increase in frequency was observed in 10.7% and 82.1% did not present any variation. No significant statistical variations in Barratt Impulsivity Scale or in the total score were found in the final evaluation when compared to baseline. Conclusion: More randomized placebo-controlled trials with topiramate for cocaine dependants should be performed to evaluate preliminary evidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available