4.8 Article

Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 459-464

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2550

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC MIA Discovery Project) [1433500-2012-14]
  2. Next-Generation Ecosystem Experiments (NGEE-Arctic) project by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the Department of Energy, Office of Science
  3. United States Department of Energy [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  4. Belgian Science Policy (OFFQ) [SD/AF/02]
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J011002/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NERC [NE/J011002/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25660113, 26711025] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stomatal conductance (g(s)) is a key land-surface attribute as it links transpiration, the dominant component of global land evapotranspiration, and photosynthesis, the driving force of the global carbon cycle. Despite the pivotal role of g(s) in predictions of global water and carbon cycle changes, a global-scale database and an associated globally applicable model of g(s) that allow predictions of stomatal behaviour are lacking. Here, we present a database of globally distributed g(s) obtained in the field for a wide range of plant functional types (PFTs) and biomes. We find that stomatal behaviour differs among PFTs according to their marginal carbon cost of water use, as predicted by the theory underpinning the optimal stomatal model(1) and the leaf and wood economics spectrum(2,3). We also demonstrate a global relationship with climate. These findin g(s) provide a robust theoretical framework for understanding and predicting the behaviour of g(s) across biomes and across PFTs that can be applied to regional, continental and global-scale modelling of ecosystem productivity, energy balance and ecohydrological processes in a future changing climate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available