4.8 Article

Future population exposure to US heat extremes

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages 652-655

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2631

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE Office of Science program on Integrated Assessment of Global Climate Change [DE-SC0006704]
  2. National Science Foundation through the NCARWeather and Climate Impacts Assessment Science Program
  3. Regional and Global Climate Modeling Program (RGCM) of the US Department of Energy's, Office of Science (BER) [DE-FC02-97ER62402]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006704] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extreme heat events are likely to become more frequent in the coming decades owing to climate change(1,2). Exposure to extreme heat depends not only on changing climate, but also on changes in the size and spatial distribution of the human population. Here we provide a new projection of population exposure to extreme heat for the continental United States that takes into account both of these factors. Using projections from a suite of regional climate models driven by global climate models and forced with the SRES A2 scenario(3) and a spatially explicit population projection consistent with the socioeconomic assumptions of that scenario, we project changes in exposure into the latter half of the twenty-first century. We find that US population exposure to extreme heat increases four- to sixfold over observed levels in the late twentieth century, and that changes in population are as important as changes in climate in driving this outcome. Aggregate population growth, as well as redistribution of the population across larger US regions, strongly affects outcomes whereas smaller-scale spatial patterns of population change have smaller effects. The relative importance of population and climate as drivers of exposure varies across regions of the country.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available