4.8 Article

Colloquium: Perspectives on core-collapse supernova theory

Journal

REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS
Volume 85, Issue 1, Pages 245-261

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.245

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program of the DOE [DE-FG02-08ER41544]
  2. NSF [ND201387, PHY-0822648]
  3. NSF PetaApps program from Louisiana State University [OCI-0905046, 44592]
  4. Princeton Institute for Computational Science and Engineering (PICSciE)
  5. Princeton University Office of Information Technology
  6. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
  7. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC03-76SF00098]
  8. National Science Foundation through the TeraGrid Advanced Support Program [TG-AST100001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Core-collapse theory brings together many facets of high-energy and nuclear astrophysics and the numerical arts to present theorists with one of the most important, yet frustrating, astronomical questions: What is the mechanism of core-collapse supernova explosions? A review of all the physics and the 50-year history involved would soon bury the reader in minutiae that could easily obscure the essential elements of the phenomenon, as we understand it today. Moreover, much remains to be discovered and explained, and a complicated review of an unresolved subject in flux could grow stale fast. Therefore, this paper describes various important facts and perspectives that may have escaped the attention of those interested in this puzzle. Furthermore, an attempt to describe the modern theory's physical underpinnings and a brief summary of the current state of play are given. In the process, a few myths that have crept into modern discourse are identified. However, there is much more to do and humility in the face of this age-old challenge is clearly the most prudent stance as its eventual resolution is sought. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.245

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available