4.8 Article

Thermal conduction phenomena in carbon nanotubes and related nanostructured materials

Journal

REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages 1295-1326

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1295

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ONR [N00014-09-1-0296-P00004]
  2. NSF-DOE thermoelectrics partnership [CBET0853350]
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship program
  4. Stanford Graduate Fellowship program
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1048796] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extremely high thermal conductivities of carbon nanotubes have motivated a wealth of research. Progress includes innovative conduction metrology based on microfabricated platforms and scanning thermal probes as well as simulations exploring phonon dispersion and scattering using both transport theory and molecular dynamics. This article highlights these advancements as part of a detailed review of heat conduction research on both individual carbon nanotubes and nanostructured films consisting of arrays of nanotubes or disordered nanotube mats. Nanotube length, diameter, and chirality strongly influence the thermal conductivities of individual nanotubes and the transition from primarily diffusive to ballistic heat transport with decreasing temperature. A key experimental challenge, for both individual nanotubes and aligned films, is the separation of intrinsic and contact resistances. Molecular dynamics simulations have studied the impacts of specific types of imperfections on the nanotube conductance and its variation with length and chirality. While the properties of aligned films fall short of predictions based on individual nanotube data, improvements in surface engagement and postfabrication nanotube quality are promising for a variety of applications including mechanically compliant thermal contacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available