4.8 Article

Resonant inelastic x-ray scattering studies of elementary excitations

Journal

REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.705

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dutch Science Foundation FOM
  2. Division of Materials Science and Engineering, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-08ER46540]
  3. U.S. DOE [DE-FG02-03ER46097]
  4. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  5. U.S. DOE, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-03ER46097] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the past decade, resonant inelastic x-ray scattering (RIXS) has made remarkable progress as a spectroscopic technique. This is a direct result of the availability of high-brilliance synchrotron x-ray radiation sources and of advanced photon detection instrumentation. The technique's unique capability to probe elementary excitations in complex materials by measuring their energy, momentum, and polarization dependence has brought RIXS to the forefront of experimental photon science. Both the experimental and theoretical RIXS investigations of the past decade are reviewed, focusing on those determining the low-energy charge, spin, orbital, and lattice excitations of solids. The fundamentals of RIXS as an experimental method are presented and then the theoretical state of affairs, its recent developments, and the different (approximate) methods to compute the dynamical RIXS response are reviewed. The last decade's body of experimental RIXS data and its interpretation is surveyed, with an emphasis on RIXS studies of correlated electron systems, especially transition-metal compounds. Finally, the promise that RIXS holds for the near future is discussed, particularly in view of the advent of x-ray laser photon sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available