Journal
REVIEWS IN THE NEUROSCIENCES
Volume 23, Issue 5-6, Pages 501-508Publisher
WALTER DE GRUYTER & CO
DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2012-0061
Keywords
X consolidation; memory; overtraining
Categories
Funding
- National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico [CONACYT 128259]
- Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico [PAPIIT IN201712]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Most of the work related to the neurobiological basis of memory has been guided by the memory consolidation theory, which was derived from the seminal work of Muller and Pilzecker that was published over a century ago. This theory proposes that the transfer from short- to long-term memory is mediated by a process called consolidation, and while consolidation is taking place, the information to be stored is in a labile state. A great deal of experimentation has given strong support to this proposal, as it has been found repeatedly that interference with neural activity shortly after a learning experience impedes durable retention of that experience. A growing body of evidence, however, indicates that intense emotional experiences prevent memory loss induced by amnesic treatments, even when these treatments are administered intracerebrally shortly after the learning experience. This evidence implies that the memory consolidation theory cannot account for long-term memory formation when neural activity is disrupted while consolidation should be taking place, and it calls for new hypotheses to account for these findings.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available