Journal
REVIEW OF PALAEOBOTANY AND PALYNOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue 3-4, Pages 175-183Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2011.08.006
Keywords
pollen analysis; automated palynology; neural networks; pollen classification
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Palynological analysis, as applied in vegetation reconstruction, climate change studies, allergy research, melissopalynology and forensic science, is a slow, laborious process. Here, we present an ongoing project aimed at the realisation of a low-cost, automatic, trainable system for the location, recognition and counting of pollen on standard glass microscope slides. This system is designed to dramatically reduce the time that the palynologist must spend at the microscope, thus considerably increasing productivity in the pollen lab. The system employs robotics, image processing and neural network technology to locate, photograph and classify pollen on a conventionally prepared pollen slide. After locating pollen grains on a microscope slide, it captures images of them. The individual images of the pollen are then analysed using a set of mathematically defined features. These feature sets are then classified by the system by comparison with feature sets previously obtained from the analysis of images of known pollen types. The classified images are then presented to the palynologist for checking. This ability for post-classification checking is a key part of the automated palynology process, as it is likely that under the current technology, it will be very difficult to produce an automated pollen counting and classifier system that is 100% correct 100% of the time. However, it is important to remember that pollen counts performed by human palynologists are seldom 100% correct 100% of the time as well. The system has been tested on slides containing fresh pollen of six different species. The slides were counted repeatedly by both the system and by human palynologists. The results of these tests show that the machine can produce counts with very similar proportions to human palynologists (typically within 1-4%). Although the means of the machine counts were usually slightly lower than those of the human counts, the variance was also lower, demonstrating that the machine counts pollen more consistently than human palynologists. The system described herein should be viewed as a potentially very valuable tool in the palynological laboratory. Its ability to discriminate between the bulk of pollen and debris on a slide and capture and store images of each pollen grain is in itself a very useful feature. This capability combined with the relatively positive results from this first all-of-system capture-and-classify test clearly demonstrate the potential of the system to considerably improve the efficiency of palynological analysis. However, more tests are required before the extent of the system's potential can be fully realised. The next step, testing the system on fossil pollen samples, is now underway. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available