4.5 Article

A Novel Pupillometric Method for Indexing Word Difficulty in Individuals With and Without Aphasia

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages 1508-1520

Publisher

AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC
DOI: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0287

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Plural Publishing Award for Graduate Student Research
  2. Ohio University
  3. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders [R43DC010079]
  4. Virginia Commonwealth Research Commercialization Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Cognitive effort is a clinically important facet of linguistic processing that is often overlooked in the assessment and treatment of people with aphasia (PWA). Furthermore, there is a paucity of valid ways to index cognitive effort in PWA. The construct of cognitive effort has been indexed for decades via pupillometry (measurement of pupil dilation and constriction during a cognitive task), yet pupillometry has not been implemented in studies including PWA. In the present study, we tested a novel method for indexing cognitive effort during linguistic processing in people with and without aphasia. Method: Forty control participants and 39 PWA listened to semantically easy and difficult single nouns and looked at images while their pupillary responses were monitored. Mean pupil dilation in response to easy versus difficult nouns was calculated to index cognitive effort. Results: Larger mean pupil dilation values were obtained for difficult compared with easy nouns for both groups. Conclusion: Results provide preliminary evidence that pupillometry can be used to index cognitive effort during linguistic processing of single nouns in people with and without aphasia. Methods for indexing cognitive effort will be a valuable addition to existing assessment methods. Suggestions for further research are offered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available