4.4 Review

MULTIMODAL IMAGING OF PIGMENT EPITHELIAL DETACHMENT A Guide to Evaluation

Journal

RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES
Volume 33, Issue 9, Pages 1735-1762

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182993f66

Keywords

retinal pigment epithelial detachment; age-related macular degeneration; drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment; serous pigment epithelial detachment; vascularized pigment epithelial detachment; retinal angiomatous proliferation; polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy; multimodal imaging; central serous chorioretinopathy

Categories

Funding

  1. Macula Foundation, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To describe the spectrum of pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) occurring mainly in age-related macular degeneration and central serous chorioretinopathy and also in other inflammatory, neoplastic and iatrogenic, retinal, and systemic disorders. Methods: Pigment epithelial detachments are divided into drusenoid, serous, vascularized, or mixed categories. Results: The clinical presentation, classification, and natural history of PEDs are reviewed as illustrated with multimodal imaging combining traditional and novel imaging techniques, including fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, fundus autofluorescence, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Most PEDs occur because of pathophysiologic mechanisms taking place below the retinal pigment epithelium that are difficult to identify with conventional imaging modalities. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography and indocyanine green angiography allow a better analysis of the subretinal pigment epithelium compartment. Conclusion: The differentiation between various kinds of PEDs is essential because each PED type is a distinct entity that has a specific pathogenesis, natural history, prognosis, and optimal treatment strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available