4.4 Article

INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB IN THE MANAGEMENT OF SUBRETINAL FLUID ASSOCIATED WITH CHOROIDAL OSTEOMA

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c720ca

Keywords

bevacizumab; choroidal osteoma; intravitreal injection; serous retinal detachment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of intravitreal injection of bevacizumab on subretinal fluid associated with choroidal osteoma. Methods: In this retrospective noncomparative case series, eyes with serous retinal detachment involving the macula were treated with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) and carefully followed-up with complete ophthalmic examination, including angiography and optical coherence tomography. The changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness were assessed by optical coherence tomography. Results: Six eyes received intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for serous retinal detachment. Only one eye had choroidal neovascularization associated with serous retinal detachment. The mean number of injections for the 6 eyes was 2.0 during the mean follow-up period of 11.3 months. The median logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.70 (Snellen equivalent, 20/100) at baseline to 0.30 (Snellen equivalent, 20/40; P = 0.043) at the final visit. The optical coherence tomography result also showed a significant reduction in central foveal thickness with a median central foveal thickness of 357.0 mm at baseline and 169.50 mm at the final visit (P = 0.028). The treatment was well tolerated, without ocular or systemic adverse events. Conclusion: Intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for serous retinal detachment secondary to choroidal osteoma resulted in both visual and anatomical improvements. RETINA 30: 945-951, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available