4.4 Article

Intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) as a treatment for refractory macular edema in patients with uveitis - A pilot study

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318156db75

Keywords

bevacizumab; uveitis; macular edema; intravitreal injection

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which has been successfully used for the treatment of age-related macular degeneration with choroidal neovascularization. As VEGF is involved in the pathomechanisms of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction the authors used bevacizumab as a last resort treatment in patients with persistent uveitic cystoid macular edema (CME). Patients and Methods: Persistent uveitic CME was defined by optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements >250 mu m despite previous treatments. The authors reviewed patients with persistent CME who subsequently had been treated with intravitreous bevacizumab 1.25 or 2.5 mg. Improvement was judged by visual acuity (VA) gain >= 2 lines and thickness reduction in OCT. Results: Eleven eyes of 10 patients were injected since February 2006. Median follow-up was 70 days. Reduction in central retinal thickness could be seen as early as 2 weeks with a mean foveal thickness reduction of 127.2 mu m at 4 weeks. Concurrent improvement in VA was seen in 4 of 10 patients, and was unchanged in the others. Four patients received two injections and five patients received three injections. Except for progression of cataract in one eye no ocular or systemic adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: Intravitreal bevacizumab seems to be an effective and safe treatment in the management of refractory inflammatory CME. The effect is transient, and reinjections may be necessary, although the time until reinjection is needed differs individually.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available