4.4 Article

Primed for Change: Developing Ecological Restoration for the 21st Century

Journal

RESTORATION ECOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 297-304

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rec.12012

Keywords

ecosystem function; ecosystem stability; goal setting; landscape effects; SER Primer; species composition

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council via an Australian Laureate Fellowship
  2. ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
  3. National Environmental Research Program Environmental Decisions Research Hub

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Restoration is a young and swiftly developing field. It has been almost a decade since the inception of one of the field's foundational documentsthe Society for Ecological Restoration International Primer on Ecological Restoration (Primer). Through a series of organized discussions, we assessed the Primer for its currency and relevance in the modern field of ecological restoration. We focused our assessment on the section entitled The Nine Attributes of a Restored Ecosystem and grouped each of the attributes into one of four categories: species composition, ecosystem function, ecosystem stability, and landscape context. We found that in the decade since the document's inception, the concepts, methods, goals, and thinking of ecological restoration have shifted significantly. We discuss each of the four categories in this light with the aim of offering comments and suggestions on options for updating the Primer. We also include a fifth category that we believe is increasingly acknowledged in ecological restoration: the human element. The Primer is an important document guiding the practice of restoration. We hope that this critical assessment contributes to its ongoing development and relevance and more generally to the development of restoration ecology, particularly in our current era of rapid environmental change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available