4.6 Article

Bronchial inflammation in hypersensitivity pneumonitis after antigen-specific inhalation challenge

Journal

RESPIROLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 891-899

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/resp.12323

Keywords

bird; cytokine; fungus; induced sputum; neutrophil

Funding

  1. Miguel Servet programme from Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CP12/03101]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS PI1001577]
  3. Sociedad Espanola de Patologia Respiratoria (SEPAR)
  4. Fundacio Catalana de Pneumologia (FUCAP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and objective: The aim of this study is to compare the inflammatory profile before and after specific inhalation challenge (SIC) in induced sputum from patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and to investigate whether different causal antigens define the resulting profile. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in 27 patients with HP: 15 patients due to exposure to birds (BHP) and 12 due to exposure to fungi (FHP), confirmed by SIC. Induced sputum was obtained before and/or 24 h after SIC. Cell types were determined by differential cell count using optical microscopy. Interferon-gamma, interleukin (IL)-12p70, IL-2, IL-10, IL-8, IL-6, IL-4, IL-5, IL-1 beta, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and TNF-beta levels were measured in the supernatants. Results: Following SIC, higher sputum neutrophilia levels (P = 0.048) and an increase in IL-8 levels (P = 0.017) were found in patients with FHP than in those with BHP. FHP patients also showed increased IL-1 beta, IL12-p70 and IL5 levels (P = 0.011, P = 0.036 and P = 0.018, respectively) after SIC. In BHP, a trend towards increases in sputum eosinophils and TH2 cytokines (IL4, IL5) was seen following SIC (P = 0.059, P = 0.068 and P = 0.075 respectively). Conclusions: This study shows that bronchial inflammation is present in patients with HP evidenced by increases in sputum neutrophils and eosinophils following exposure to the offending antigen during SIC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available