4.2 Article

Limitations of respiratory muscle and vastus lateralis blood flow during continuous exercise

Journal

RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 181, Issue 3, Pages 302-307

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2012.04.001

Keywords

Cycle exercise; Near infrared spectroscopy; Ventilation; Work of breathing

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. NSERC
  3. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (MSFHR)
  4. Canadian Thoracic Society
  5. Canadian Lung Association
  6. Department of Medicine, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital
  7. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
  8. Canadian Stroke Network
  9. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  10. MSFHR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurement of regional blood flow to the respiratory muscles has traditionally been invasive. The blood flow index (BFI). a minimally invasive method using indocyanine green dye (ICG) and near infrared spectroscopy, allows assessment of within subject changes in regional blood flow. This study assessed regional BR to the vastus lateralis muscle (QBFI) and the superficial respiratory muscles in the seventh intercostal space (RMBFI). Eight healthy subjects cycled continuously at incrementally more difficulty stages to exhaustion. In our subjects. QBFI declined between 83% and 100% of maximal exertion (p = 0.002) and no statistically significant changes in RMBFI were seen despite steadily increasing ventilatory workloads. Post hoc pairwise comparisons demonstrated that QBFI at 83% work (0.015 mu moles s(-1) +/- 0.005) was significantly higher than at maximum work output (0.011 mu moles s(-1) +/- 0.004, p = 0.007). There were no other significant differences of QBFI between maximum work output and different levels of work. The current study suggests that respiratory and locomotor muscle blood flow during sub-maximal and maximal exertion is unable to match increasing workloads. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available