4.2 Article

Respiratory response of malignant and placental cells to changes in oxygen concentration

Journal

RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 165, Issue 2-3, Pages 154-160

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2008.11.001

Keywords

Respirometry; Placental leucocytes; Malignant cells; p(50); Hypoxia

Funding

  1. Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research (IZKF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Malignant cells and foetal tissues are exposed to low oxygen partial pressure (pO(2)) in situ due to the limited supply of oxygenated blood. Whether these cells have adapted to low pO(2) or live under constant constraint is not clear. Herein, we compared the respiratory responses of different malignant cell types, maternal and foetal placental leucocytes, and benign cells by incubating them under a gradient of pO(2), from saturation to hypoxia, in a high resolution respirometer. The malignant cells and foetal leucocytes showed higher rates of mitochondrial oxygen uptake compared to the benign cells and maternal leucocytes, respectively. On the other hand, the mitochondrial oxygen uptake rates of the hypoxia adapted cells declined faster than the other cell types during the onset of hypoxia, probably suggesting conformance of aerobic metabolism to the local oxygen concentration. The O-2 consumption rate per million cells (JO(2)) of the malignant cells declined only when the O-2 concentration ([O-2]) decreased to values <= 10 mu M. On the other hand, the JO(2) of the benign cells declined with the decrease in [O-2] from 200 to 40 mu M and <= 10 mu M. In the [O-2] ranges outside these values the JO(2) remained constant regardless of the decline of [O-2] in the medium. The JO(2) of foetal leucocytes and malignant cells responded to the change in [O-2] in a similar manner, and may indicate comparable mechanisms of adaptation to hypoxia. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available