4.2 Article

Graded unilateral cervical spinal cord injury and respiratory motor recovery

Journal

RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY & NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 165, Issue 2-3, Pages 245-253

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2008.12.010

Keywords

Plasticity; Spinal cord injury; Crossed phrenic; Breathing; Respiratory

Funding

  1. Christopher Reeve Paralysis Foundation (DDF)
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [RO3 NS050684]
  3. NIH [1 R01 NS054025]
  4. Craig H. Neilsen Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the potential contribution of ventromedial (VM) tissue sparing to respiratory recovery following chronic (1 mo) unilateral C2 spinal cord injury (SCI) in rats. Preserved white matter ipsilateral to the injury was quantitatively expressed relative to contralateral white matter. The ipsilateral-to-contralateral white matter ratio was 0 after complete C2 hemisection (C2HS) and 0.23 +/- 0.04 with minimal VM sparing. Inspiratory (breath min(-1)) and phrenic frequency (burst min(-1)), measured by plethysmography (conscious rats) and phrenic neurograms (anesthetized rats) respectively, were both lower with minimal VM sparing (p<0.05 vs. C2HS). Tidal volume also was greater in minimal VM sparing rats during a hypercapnic challenge (p < 0.05 vs. C2HS). In other C2 hemilesioned rats with more extensive VM matter sparing (ipsilateral-to-contralateral white matter ratio = 0.55 +/- 0.05), respiratory deficits were indicated at 1 mo post-injury by reduced ventilation during hypercapnic challenge (p < 0.05 vs. uninjured). Anterograde (ventral respiratory column-to-spinal cord) neuroanatomical tracing studies showed that descending respiratory projections from the brainstem are present in VM tissue. We conclude that even relatively minimal sparing of VM tissue after C2 hemilesion can alter respiratory outcomes. In addition, respiratory deficits can emerge in the adult rat after high cervical SCI even when relatively extensive VM sparing occurs. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available