4.5 Article

Home spirometry as early detector of azithromycin refractory bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in lung transplant recipients

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages 405-412

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.12.016

Keywords

Azithromycin; Bronchiolitis; Lung

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01EO0802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To evaluate the utility of home spirometry (HS) versus office spirometry (OS) in assessing treatment response to azithromycin in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). Methods: 239 Lung transplant recipients were retrospectively studied. Delta FEV1 +/- 10% from FEV1 at azithromycin initiation for >= 7 consecutive days in HS or >= 2 measures in OS were taken as cut-off for response or progression. Results: Based upon HS, 161/239 (67%) patients were progressive despite macrolide, 19 of who exhibited transient improvement in FEV1 (11%). Time to progression was 29 (13-96) days earlier with HS than in OS. Forty-six (19%) recipients responded in HS after median 81 (22-343) days, whilst 22% remained stable. Concordance in azithromycin treatment response between OS and HS was observed in 210 of 239 patients (88%). Response or stabilization conferred significant improvement in survival (p = 0.005). Transient azithromycin responders demonstrated improved survival when compared to azithromycin refractory patients (p = 0.034). Conclusions: HS identified azithromycin refractory patients significantly earlier than OS, possibly facilitating aggressive treatment escalation that may improve long-term outcome. Treatment response to azithromycin should be assessed 4 weeks after initiation. Responders demonstrated best survival, with even transient response conferring benefit. Macroliderefractory BOS carried the worst prognosis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available