4.5 Article

The value of exhaled nitric oxide to identify asthma in smoking patients with asthma-like symptoms

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages 794-801

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.02.009

Keywords

Exhaled nitric oxide; Smoking habits; Asthma; Diagnostic value; Cut-offs

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Bror Hjerpsteds Stiftelse
  3. Uppsala University Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The fraction of nitric oxide in exhaled air (FeNO) is used in asthma diagnosis and management. Smoking reduces FeNO and 20-35% of asthmatics are smoking. However no guidelines exist on the diagnostic value of FeNO in smokers. Therefore we assessed the value of FeNO to diagnose asthma in a population of subjects with asthma-like symptoms and different smoking habits. Methods: Measurements of FeNO, lung function, bronchial responsiveness and allergy testing were performed in 282 subjects (108 never-, 62 ex- and 112 current smokers) aged 14-44 years, with symptoms suggestive of asthma. These subjects were a subset of subjects reporting respiratory symptoms (n = 686) in a random population sample (n = 10,400). Results: A diagnosis of asthma was given to 96 of the 282 subjects. Subjects with asthma had higher FeNO levels than subjects with non-specific asthma symptoms in all three smoking strata (p < 0.001), with a percentual increase of FeNO by 76% in never-, 71% in ex-and 60% in current smokers. The area under the ROC-curve was similar in never-, ex-and current smokers (0.72 vs. 0.74 vs. 0.70). The cut-offs were approximately 30% lower for either 90% specificity (22 vs. 31 ppb) or 90% sensitivity (7 vs. 10 ppb) in current vs. never-smokers. Conclusions: FeNO could differentiate asthmatic subjects from non-asthmatic subjects with asthma-like symptoms equally well in both never-and current smokers within a random population sample. The FeNO cut-off levels needed in order to achieve high sensitivity or specificity were lower in current smokers. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available