4.5 Article

Reference values for paediatric pulmonary function testing: The Utrecht dataset

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 15-23

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.07.020

Keywords

Bodyplethysmography; Diffusion capacity; Interrupter resistance; Reference data; Spirometry

Funding

  1. Catharijne Stichting UMC Utrecht
  2. Sophie Bueninck Stichting, the Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Since populations evolve, measurement protocols and equipment improve and analysis techniques progress, there is an ongoing need to reassess reference data for pulmonary function tests. Furthermore, reference values for total lung capacity and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity are scarcely available in children. We aimed to provide updated reference equations for most commonly used pulmonary function indices in Caucasian children. Methods: In the 'Utrecht Pulmonary Function Reference Data Study' we collected data in Caucasian children aged 2-18 years. We analyzed them using the 'Generalized Additive Models for Location Scale and Shape' (GAMLSS) statistical method. Results: Measurements of interrupter resistance (R-int) (n = 877), spirometry (n = 1042), body plethysmography (n = 723) and carbon monoxide diffusion/helium dilution (n = 543) were obtained in healthy children. Height (or the natural logarithm of height) and age (or the natural logarithm of age) were both significantly related to most outcome measures. Also sex was a significant determinant, except for RV, RV/TLC, FRCpleth, Raw(0.5), Raw(tot), R-int and FEF values. The application of previously published reference equations on the study population resulted in misinterpretation of pulmonary function. Conclusion: These new paediatric reference equations provide accurate estimates of the range of normality for most commonly used pulmonary function indices, resulting in less underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of pulmonary diseases. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available