4.5 Article

Genetic influences on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A twin study

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 104, Issue 12, Pages 1890-1895

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.05.004

Keywords

Genetics; COPD; Susceptibility; Twins

Funding

  1. Danish Medical Research Council
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. NIH [AG 08/24]
  4. NOW/MaGW [VENI 451 08 025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Genes that contribute to the risk of developing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) have been identified, but an attempt to accurately quantify the total genetic contribution to COPD has to our knowledge never been conducted Methods Hospital discharge diagnoses data on COPD were analysed in 22,422 Danish twin pairs, 20-71 years of age The analyses were replicated in a population of 27,668 Swedish twin pairs, 45-108 years of age A Cox regression model was applied to the discordant time from the age at first hospital admission for COPD in the co twin of an affected twin Latent factor models were used to estimate genetic and environmental effects Results The probandwise concordance rate for COPD was higher in monozygotic (MZ) than in dizygotic (DZ) twins, 0 19 vs 0 07 (p = 0 08) in the Danish population, and 0 20 vs 0 08 (p = 0 006) in the Swedish population After adjusting for sex, smoking and age at first hospital admission the risk of developing COPD in the co twin of an affected twin was higher in MZ than in DZ twins, with hazards ratio 4 3 (95% confidence interval 1 2-15 8, p = 0 03) in Danish twins and 3 4 (1 5-7 7, p = 0 004) in Swedish twins According to the most parsimonious model, additive genetic factors explained 63% (46-77%) of the individual COPD susceptibility in the Danish population and 61% (48-72%) in the Swedish population Conclusion The susceptibility to develop severe COPD, as defined by hospitalizations, is strongly influenced by genetic factors Approximately 60% of the individual susceptibility can be explained by genetic factors (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available