4.5 Article

Clinical significance of decline in serum IgE levels in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis

Journal

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages 204-210

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.09.005

Keywords

ABPA, Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; High-attenuation mucus; Hyperdense mucus; Computed tomography; Remission; Relapse; IgE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aims: The total serum IgE level is a marker of immunological activity in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), and a 35% decline beyond six weeks is traditionally taken as criteria for remission. The aim of this study was to evaluate the magnitude and clinical significance of decline in serum IgE levels at six weeks in patients with ABPA. Methods: AR consecutive patients with ABPA presenting to the Chest Clinic were followed up with clinical evaluation, total IgE levels and chest x-ray every six weeks for three months. We analyzed the percentage decline in IgE levels and correlated it with clinical outcomes of relapse and complete remission. Results: Of the 242 asthmatics, 54 were diagnosed with ABPA (29 mates, 25 females; mean age-34 years). There was clinical and radiological improvement at six weeks in all patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy. The IgE levels fell by a mean of 38.8%, and the decline was significantly higher in patients with baseline IgE levels >2500 IU/mL than with levels <= 2500 IU/mL (44% vs. 26%). Twenty-two patients did not attain a 35% decline in IgE levels, and this number was significantly higher in patients with IgE levels <2500 IU/mL. On multivariate analysis, the decline in IgE levels at six weeks did not predict clinical outcomes. Conclusions: A 35% decline in serum IgE levels at six weeks is not seen in all patients with ABPA, and the decline is slower in patients with baseline IgE levels <2500 IU/mL. The quantum decline in serum IgE levels does not predict clinical outcomes. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available