4.7 Article

Techno-economic and environmental assessment of an olive stone based biorefinery

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 145-150

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.09.008

Keywords

Biorefinery; Olive stone; Ethanol; Xylitol; PHB; Furfural

Funding

  1. Universidad Nacional de Colombia at Manizales
  2. Investigation and extension direction, from the Engineering and Architecture Faculty from Universidad de Colombia Sede Manizales
  3. Investigation Direction at Manizales (DIMA) [157, 16081]
  4. Agrifood Excellence Campus in University of Jaen [ceiA3]
  5. Agrifood International Doctorate School [eidA3]
  6. Junta de Andalucia (Proyecto de Excelencia) [AGR-6103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Olive tree cultivation is spreading worldwide as a consequence of beneficial effects of olive oil consumption. Olive oil production process and table olive industries are the major sources of olive stones. Currently, this by-product is used in direct combustion to produce energy as electricity or heat. However, there are other possibilities for taking full advantage of a renewable source of interesting compounds. In this work the techno-economic and environmental assessment of two biorefinery schemes and its comparison with the direct combustion (base case) of this residue are presented. The first biorefinery scheme describes the integrated production of xylitol, furfural, ethanol and poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB). The second biorefinery scheme considers the production of xylitol, furfural, ethanol and PHB integrated to a cogeneration system for producing bioenergy from the solid residues resulting from the mentioned processes. The results showed that in the first biorefinery scheme, the net profit margin is approximately 53%, while the second present a net profit margin of 6%. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available