4.7 Review

Effectiveness of novel and traditional methods to incorporate industrial wastes in cementitious materials-An overview

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 134-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.03.003

Keywords

Industrial waste; Pozzolanic activity; Blended cement; Effectiveness; Environmental benefit

Funding

  1. 973 National Foundational Research of China [2009CB623104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51072058]
  3. Joint Foundation of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1134008]
  4. China Post-doctoral Science Foundation [2012M521599]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable development and eco-efficiency are urgent and imperative demands for the well-being of our planet, continued growth of a society, and human development. Traditional Portland cement production seems unsustainable due to consumption of huge natural resources and energy and significant CO2 emissions. The volume of industrial wastes is increasing significantly, leading to a number of economical and ecological problems. Although industrial wastes can be incorporated in cementitious materials by various traditional methods, the substitution ratio of industrial wastes in cementitious materials is relatively low to avoid unacceptable performance loss. Novel methods, such as improving hydraulic activities of metallurgical slags by adding composition adjusting material at high temperature, improving surface cementitious properties of fly ashes by dehydration and rehydration treatment, and arranging cement clinker and industrial wastes in the particle size distribution of blended cements according to their hydraulic activities, are reviewed. These methods provide more effective approach to prepare high performance blended cements with larger amount of industrial wastes, leading to a very significant role in CO2 emissions reducing, resources and energy conservation of the cement industry. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available