4.7 Article

The technical potential for reducing metal requirements through lightweight product design

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 48-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.018

Keywords

Lightweight design; Material efficiency; Design principles; CO(2) emissions

Funding

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/G007217/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/G007217/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G007217/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal production consumes around 10% of all global energy, so is a significant driver of climate change and other concerns about sustainability. Demand for metal is rising and forecast to double by 2050 through a combination of growing total demand from developing countries, and ongoing replacement demand in developed economies. Metal production is already extremely efficient, so the major opportunities for emissions abatement in the sector are likely to arise from material efficiency - using less new metal to meet demand for services. Therefore this paper examines the opportunity to reduce requirements for steel and aluminium by lightweight design. A set of general principles for lightweight design are proposed by way of a simple analytical example, and are then applied to five case study products which cumulatively account for 30% of global steel product output. It is shown that exploiting lightweight design opportunities for these five products alone could reduce global steel requirements by 5%, and similar savings in aluminium products could reduce global aluminium requirements by 7%. If similar savings to those in the design case studies were possible in all steel and aluminium products, total material requirements could be reduced by 25-30%. However, many of these light-weighting measures are, at present, economically unattractive, and may take many years to implement. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available