4.7 Article

A mechanical pre-treatment process for the valorization of useful fractions from spent batteries

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 309-315

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.10.002

Keywords

Spent batteries; Crushing; Sieving; Recycling; Economic analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper the authors propose a full-scale plant aimed to pre-treat spent batteries in order to obtain cleaned useful fractions (magnetic and non-magnetic metals, paper, plastic, a fine-sized material made of a metal-carbon mixture). The treating process was designed after having analyzed and tested a representative sample coming from the whole amount of spent batteries collected in 1 month by the public service in and around Turin. The analyses performed on the sample allowed the authors to determine its in-percentage composition in term of type of batteries: 60-70% b.w. (by weight) alkaline, 25-30% b.w. Zn-C and 5-10% b.w. other types. For each type, the composition in term of size (AAA or LR03; AA or LR6; Cot LR14; Dot LR20; 9 V or 6F22A; 4.5 V or 3R12A) has also been determined. The treatment for the recovery of secondary raw materials foresees the following phases: - separation of useful types/sizes of exhaust batteries to undergo further treatments by means of a first sieving process; - liberation of the single components taking advantage of a crushing operation; - separation of a fine-sized material (to subject to pyro or hydro metallurgic recovery) from a coarse-sized material (to send to secondary smelt foundries and incinerators) by means of a second sieving phase. On the basis of the results obtained from the crushing/sieving laboratory tests and the chemical characterization, a full-scale plant able to treat about 76,000 t/y of spent batteries has been designed. The cost analysis performed on the proposed treatment plant has given back a unit pre-treatment cost equal to 3 per ton of processed spent batteries. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available