4.2 Article

The Bland-Altman Method Should Not Be Used in Regression Cross-Validation Studies

Journal

RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT
Volume 82, Issue 4, Pages 610-616

Publisher

AMER ALLIANCE HEALTH PHYS EDUC REC & DANCE
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599797

Keywords

bias; calibration; difference plots; measurement error

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the bias in the Bland-Altman (BA) limits of agreement method when it is used to validate regression models. Data from 1,158 men were used to develop three regression equations to estimate maximum oxygen uptake (R-2 = .40, .61, and .82, respectively). The equations were evaluated in a cross-validation sample of 581 men. The BA means and differences were correlated (p < .001) in the cross-validation sample for each model (r = .55, .39, and .26, respectively), thus demonstrating bias. The BA method is inappropriate for validation of regression models. Validation of regression equations is properly conducted by plotting the residuals against the estimated values and examining the magnitude of the estimation error

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available