4.6 Article

Immunoregulatory effects of Taishan Pinus massoniana pollen polysaccharide on chicks co-infected with avian leukosis virus and Bordetella avium early in ovo

Journal

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 260-266

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.11.010

Keywords

Embryo-borne diseases; Bordetella avium; Subgroup B avian leukosis virus; Co-infection; Taishan Pinus massoniana pollen; polysaccharide

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31272595, 30972183]
  2. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201203055]
  3. Science and Technology Development Plan of Shandong Province [2012GNC11020]
  4. Specific Technology Development Projects of Taian [20103001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, co-infection of chicken embryos with immunosuppressive viruses and bacteria occurs with an annually increasing frequency. Consequently, studies on new and safe immunoregulators, especially plant polysaccharides, have become a popular topic in the poultry industry. In the present study, we selected 300 specific pathogen free embryonated eggs, which were injected with subgroup B avian leukosis virus (ALV-B) and Bordetella avium (B. avium) to establish an artificial co-infection model. The chicks that hatched from these co-infected embryonated eggs were treated with Taishan Pinus massoniana pollen polysaccharide (TPPPS). Results indicated that relevant indices in the co-infection group were significantly lower than that in B. avium-only group. Furthermore, pathogenicity of B. avium was exacerbated, with the chicks exhibiting decreased body weights. The TPPPS groups exhibited gradual improvements in immune function and developmental status. Therefore, in terms of improving immunologic function and production performance, TPPPS could be used as immunoregulator for immune responses. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available