4.6 Article

Effects of salinomycin and Bacillus subtilis on growth performance and immune responses in broiler chickens

Journal

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages 304-308

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.07.021

Keywords

Bacillus subtilis; Salinomycin; Growth performance; Immunity; Cytokines; Broiler chickens

Funding

  1. ARS-USDA [1265-32000-086015T]
  2. Rural Development Administration, Korea [PJ010490]
  3. ARS [1265-32000-097]
  4. Danisco

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study was undertaken to compare the effect of salinomycin and Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, serum antibody levels against Clostridium spp. and Eimeria spp., and cytokine mRNA expression levels in broiler chickens raised in the used litter. Broiler chickens fed a diet containing salinomycin showed lower (P < 0.05) body weights compared with the control diet-fed counterparts. Serum nitric oxide levels were significantly (P < 0.05) elevated in chickens fed the B. subtilis-enriched diet compared with those on either the salinomycin-fed or control diet-fed chickens. None of the dietary treatments affected (P > 0.05) serum antibody levels against Clostridium pezfringens toxins. Both salinomycin and B. subtilis significantly lowered (P < 0.05) the serum levels of Eimeria-specific antibodies compared with the control group. Salinomycin, but not B. subtilis, significantly modulated (P < 0.05) the expression of cytokines encoding interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), interleukin10(IL-10) and tumor necrosis factor superfamily 15 (TNESF15) compared with the control group. In conclusion, dietary salinomycin and B. subtilis affected serum anticoccidial antibody and intestinal cytokine expression, but failed to improve growth performance in broiler chickens. Further study is warranted to investigate the mode of action of salinomycin on host immune response and growth performance in broiler chickens. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available