4.6 Article

Molecular survey of pathogenic trypanosomes in naturally infected Nigerian cattle

Journal

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages 555-561

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.10.018

Keywords

Cattle; Molecular diagnostics; Nigeria; PCR; Trypanosomes

Funding

  1. Education Trust Fund for Staff Training and Development of the Federal Republic of Nigeria
  2. College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to survey pathogenic trypanosome infection in naturally infected Nigerian cattle. In 411 animals sampled, microscopy detected 15.1% positive infection of at least one of Trypanosoma brucei, Tiypanosoma congolense or Trypanosoma vivax, while PCR detected 63.7% positive infections of at least one of those species and Tiypanosoma evansi. PCR detected 4.4%, 48.7%, 26.0% and 0.5% respectively of T. brucei, T. congolense, T. vivax and T. evansi infections. All of the T. congolense detected were savannah-type, except for two forest-type infections. Prevalence of mixed infections was 13.9%, being primarily co-infection by T. congolense and T. vivax while prevalence of mixed infections by T. evansi, T. vivax and T. congolense was 1.5%. Microscopy showed poor sensitivity but specificity greater than 94%. Infection rates were much higher in Southern than in Northern Nigeria. Infections were lowest in N'dama compared to Muturu, Sokoto Gudali and White Fulani breeds. Animals with T. vivax monoinfection and mixed infections showed significantly lower packed cell volume (PCV) values. Those infected with any Trypanosoma species with <200 parasites/mu l showed higher PCV values than those infected with >200 parasites/mu l. The new finding of savannah- and forest- type T. congolense in Nigeria and the relatively high abundance of mixed infections are of significant clinical relevance. This study also suggests that T. congolense is the most prevalent species in Nigeria. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available