4.6 Article

Cellular and humoral immunogenicity of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis specific lipopentapeptide antigens

Journal

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages 123-129

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.03.002

Keywords

Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis; Paratuberculosis; Johne's disease; Antibody ELISA; PBMC; Lipid antigen

Funding

  1. Meat and Livestock Australia
  2. Cattle Council of Australia
  3. Sheep Meat Council of Australia
  4. Wool Producers Australia through Animal Health Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Paratuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) is a chronic infectious disease affecting domestic and wild ruminants. Antigens currently used for the diagnosis of paratuberculosis are whole-cell derived crude preparations. The identification of MAP-specific antigens for the specific and early diagnosis of this infection is strongly needed. This study assessed the ability of the MAP-specific synthetic lipopeptide antigen Para-LP-01 to invoke specific serum antibody (Ab) and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses in sheep experimentally exposed to MAP S strain. Responses were compared to those elicited by the crude whole-cell derived MAP 316v antigen (316v). Para-LP-01 induced a significant serum Ab response in MAP-infected sheep in comparison with unexposed or uninfected sheep, but failed to induce detectable CMI responses including production of IFN-gamma, IL-10 and lymphoproliferation, unlike 316v which invoked both CMI and serum Ab responses in MAP-exposed sheep. Para-LP-01 is a suitable antigen for serodiagnosis of MAP-infection in sheep. The differential induction of humoral and CMI responses by lipid based antigens could enhance current understanding of the role played by cell-wall associated lipid antigens in the pathogenesis of MAP-infection. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available