4.7 Article

A geometric model for intrinsic residual strain and phase stability in high entropy alloys

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages 152-161

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.04.051

Keywords

High entropy alloys; Analytical modeling; Hume-Rothery's rules; Metal and alloys; Phase stability

Funding

  1. Research Grant Council (RGC), the Hong Kong government, through the general research fund (GRF) [CityU11214914, CityU117612]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following the Hume Rothery rules, it is a longstanding notion that atomic size mismatch induces intrinsic residual strains in a common lattice which may cause lattice instability and thus phase transition in an alloy. For conventional alloys, such an intrinsic residual strain can be derived with the continuum theory of elasticity; however, lack of distinction between solvent and solute atoms in recently developed high entropy alloys simply defies such an approach. Here, we develop a general self-contained geometric model that enables the calculation of intrinsic residual strains around different sized elements in a multi-component alloy, which links the average lattice constant of the alloy to a few critical geometric variables related to the close atomic packing in that lattice, such as atomic size, atomic fraction and packing density. When applied to glass-forming high entropy alloys and bulk metallic glasses, our model unravels that amorphization occurs when the root-mean-square (R.M.S.) residual strain rises above similar to 10%, in good agreement with the Lindemann's lattice instability criterion. By comparison, the transition from a single- to multi-phase solid solution takes place in crystalline high entropy alloys when the R.M.S. residual strain approaches similar to 5%. Our current findings provide a quantitative insight into phase stability in multicomponent alloys, which should be useful in the design of high entropy alloys with desired phases. (C) 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available