4.6 Article

Prediction of IVF/ICSI outcome based on the follicular output rate

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 147-153

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.04.012

Keywords

embryo transfer; follicular output rate; IVF; ICSI; ovarian stimulation; polycystic ovary syndrome

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB944502, 2012CB944700]
  2. Yantai Science and Technology Development Projects [2008142-20]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81200409]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the true accuracy of follicular output rate (FORT) as a prognostic indicator of response to FSH and reproductive competence after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A total of 1643 cycles, including 140 polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients who underwent ovarian stimulation, were studied. FORT was calculated as the ratio of preovulatory follicle count on the day of stimulation x 100/small antral follicle count (3-10 mm in diameter) at baseline. Low, medium and high FORT groups were defined according to tertile values. Among 1503 non-PCOS cycles, numbers of retrieved oocytes and of all embryos that could be transferred, as well as rates of good-quality embryos, embryo implantations and clinical pregnancies, progressively increased with FORT. In PCOS patients, FORT were significantly lower in patients who achieved clinical pregnancy compared with those who did not (0.56 +/- 0.21 versus 0.66 +/- 0.29, P = 0.031). Fertilization and good-quality embryo rates were significantly higher with medium FORT than low and high FORT (P = 0.001 and P = 0.047, respectively). Medium FORT in PCOS patients and high FORT in non-PCOS patients may predict better outcomes for IVF/ICSI. RBMOnline (C) 2013, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available