4.6 Article

Modified natural cycle IVF and mild IVF: a 10 year Swedish experience

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 156-162

Publisher

REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.017

Keywords

clomiphene citrate; low cost IVF; mild IVF; modified natural cycle IVF; natural cycle

Funding

  1. Queen Sophia Hospital, Stockholm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modified natural cycle IVF (mnc-IVF) or mild IVF (m-IVF) was offered to selected patients between 1996 and 2007; 43 patients during 129 cycles were treated with mnc-IVF and 145 couples during 250 cycles were treated with m-IVF. Comparison with outcome from conventional IVF cycles during the same time period and in the same clinic was performed. Although 53.5 and 39.6% of started cycles respectively never reached embryo transfer, the ongoing pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were 26.7% for mnc-IVF and 27.2% for m-IVF. During the same time period, cancellation rate for conventional IVF was 13.7% and the ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 34.3%. For patients >= 38 years of age, the ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 17.5% in the m-IVF group. None of the patients aged >= 38 years in the mnc-IVF group achieved an ongoing pregnancy. For patients treated with conventional IVF, the >= 38 years of age pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was 27.0%. Costs of medication for m-IVF and mnc-IVF were 96.3 and 97.5% less than for the least expensive conventional IVF cycle respectively. Pregnancy rates per embryo transfer are acceptable for these treatment modalities, the cost for medication is tow, risks for complications are dramatically reduced, and the treatments may be more psychologically acceptable to the patients. (C) 2009, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available