4.6 Review

Milder is better? advantages and disadvantages of mild ovarian stimulation for human in vitro fertilization

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-25

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the last decades, several steps have been made aiming at rendering human IVF more successful on one side, more tolerable on the other side. The mild ovarian stimulation approach, in which a lower-than-average dose of exogenous gonadotropins is given and gonadotropin treatment is started from day 2 to 7 of the cycle, represents a significant step toward a more patient's friendly IVF. However, a clear view of its virtues and defects is still lacking, because only a few prospective randomized trials comparing mild vs. conventional stimulation exist, and they do not consider some important aspects, such as, e. g., thawing cycles. This review gives a complete panorama of the mild stimulation philosophy, showing its advantages vs. conventional ovarian stimulation, but also discussing its disadvantages. Both patients with a normal ovarian responsiveness to exogenous gonadotropins and women with a poor ovarian reserve are considered. Overall, we conclude that the level of evidence supporting the use of mild stimulation protocols is still rather poor, and further, properly powered prospective studies about mild treatment regimens are required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available