4.3 Article

Cryotolerance and global gene-expression patterns of Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus in vitro- and in vivo-produced blastocysts

Journal

REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages 1129-1141

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/RD13099

Keywords

bovine; cryopreservation; cryosurvival; transcriptome

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (Sao Paulo Research Foundation - FAPESP) [2009/54513-3, 2010/09922-0, 2012/02333-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a 2x2 factorial experimental design, embryo development, cryotolerance and global gene expression of Nellore (Bos taurus indicus) and Simmental (Bos taurus taurus) blastocysts produced in vitro (IVP) and in vivo (multiple ovulation derived embryo, MODE) were assessed. Blastocyst production was higher in Nellore than in Simmental (47.7 +/- 2.0% vs 27.0 +/- 2.0%) cows. The total numbers of ova or embryos recovered (5.5 +/- 0.9 vs 3.7 +/- 0.8) and transferable embryos (3.8 +/- 1.0 vs 2.3 +/- 0.8) per cow were not different between breeds. Simmental and MODE (34.6% and 38.5%, n=75 and 70) blastocysts had higher survival rates after cryopreservation compared with Nellore and IVP (20.2% and 18.1%, n=89 and 94) embryos, respectively. Differences between transcriptomes were addressed by principal-component analysis, which indicated that gene expression was affected by subspecies (158 genes), origin (532 genes) and interaction between both subspecies and origin (53 genes). Several functional processes and pathways relevant to lipid metabolism and embryo viability involving differentially expressed genes were identified. The lipid metabolism-related genes were upregulated in Simmental (AUH and ELOVL6) and IVP (ACSL3 and ACSL6) blastocysts. The expression profiles of genes related to mitochondrial metabolism (ATP5B), oxidative stress (GPX4), apoptosis (DAD1, DAP, PRDX2), heat shock (HSPA5), pregnancy (IFNT2, PAG2) and cell differentiation (KRT18) varied between experimental groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available