4.7 Review

The prognostic role of neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio and platelet count in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 84-91

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.681

Keywords

Neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio; Platelet count; Gastric cancer; Prognosis; Meta-analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Systemic inflammatory response was reported to be associate with a poor survival in gastric cancer. However, these results remain inconsistent. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognostic role of neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR) and platelet count in gastric cancer. Methods: Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. Data was pooled using a fixed-effects models or random-effects models. Results: A total of 29 studies were included for meta-analysis (19 for NLR, 10 for platelet count). Elevated NLR and platelet count were associated with an increased lymph node metastasis and serosal invasion (T3 + T4) risk with individual ORs being 1.70 (95% CI: 1.05-2.75) and 2.93 (95% CI: 2.27-3.78), 1.62 (95% CI: 1.08-2.42) and 2.09 (95% CI: 1.57-2.77), respectively. The incidence of stage (III + IV) in elevated NLR group was higher than in normal NLR group (OR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.48-2.35). The disease-free survival in patients with elevated NLR was markedly shorter (HR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.28-1.94). For the overall survival, both indicators were strong predictors with individual HRs being 1.65 (95% CI: 1.47-1.83), 1.61 (95% CI: 1.35-1.86), respectively. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that elevated NLR and platelet count predict poor survival in patients with gastric cancer, and may provides some useful evidence for the clinical application of the two prognostic indicators in gastric cancer. (C) 2015 US Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available